Author |
Message |
Stolbun
V.I.P
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 220
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Zagreb/Croatia
|
Posted: Thu 23:11, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: Which team was better 1996. or 2001.? |
|
|
Let hear Your opinions
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Dado
Admin
Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
|
Posted: Thu 23:21, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
2001>1996
It was for Ray.
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wobbie
Mod
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: germany
|
Posted: Thu 23:25, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
96 because it was so unexpected and they were fighting so bad for it. and of course the krupp factor
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dado
Admin
Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
|
Posted: Thu 23:26, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
wobbie wrote: | 96 because it was so unexpected and they were fighting so bad for it. and of course the krupp factor |
SC 96 Final was very easy than 01...
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stolbun
V.I.P
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 220
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Zagreb/Croatia
|
Posted: Thu 23:27, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
wobbie wrote: | 96 because it was so unexpected and they were fighting so bad for it. and of course the krupp factor | Legendary overtime goal.
I think 1996 team was better,but of course both teams were great
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stolbun
V.I.P
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 220
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Zagreb/Croatia
|
Posted: Thu 23:27, 30 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Dado wrote: | wobbie wrote: | 96 because it was so unexpected and they were fighting so bad for it. and of course the krupp factor |
SC 96 Final was very easy than 01... | Sweep
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Norbstar
V.I.P
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 248
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Hornstein, Austria (near Vienna)
|
Posted: Fri 12:57, 31 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
2001 was better IMO...more balanced team
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Finro
V.I.P
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 272
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Ylivieska, Finland
|
Posted: Fri 14:48, 31 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Norbstar wrote: | 2001 was better IMO...more balanced team |
2001
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
killkate
Pee wee
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 20
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Cardiff, UK
|
Posted: Wed 19:46, 05 Sep 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Finro wrote: | Norbstar wrote: | 2001 was better IMO...more balanced team |
2001 |
Roy, Blake, Bourque, Drury, Tanguay - great players, great team
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Norbstar
V.I.P
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 248
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Hornstein, Austria (near Vienna)
|
Posted: Wed 20:19, 05 Sep 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
killkate wrote: | Finro wrote: | Norbstar wrote: | 2001 was better IMO...more balanced team |
2001 |
Roy, Blake, Bourque, Drury, Tanguay - great players, great team |
not only these...I mean, did you ever seen a better balanced team???
Goalies: A+ ---> Pat Roy and Backup David Aebischer
Defense: A ----> Bourque, Blake, Foote, Klemm, DeVries and the only weakness Skoula
Offense: A++ ---> Sakic, Tanguay, Forsberg (although he was injured in playoffs), Drury, Hejduk, Podein, Hinote, Nieminen etc....
THAT was a team...
1996-team was also very good, but it lacked a little bit on defense, there were some weaknesses on defense IMO...
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Avs
Admin
Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 405
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed 20:25, 05 Sep 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
rather 2001
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|