FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in
Colorado Avalanche Forum Index
->
European hockey
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Informations
----------------
Information
Hockey Talk
----------------
Avs Talk
NHL Talk
In the System
EuroLanche
----------------
Members talk
Trips
Ideas
Other...
Season 2007/08
----------------
Preseason
Regular Season
Play-off
Other
----------------
HydePark
European hockey
Rubbish
Toplists
----------------
Forum toplist
Topic review
Author
Message
wlkleo00cpz
Posted: Wed 5:58, 25 Sep 2013
Post subject:
"Pour la naissance de mon dernier, le médecin m'avait proposé un "kit" : pour 6 000 euros, je pouvais l'équipe au complet - le médecin, l'anesthésiste et la sage-femme", raconte Mme Tsaganas. Moralité - si l'on peut - : "A Patras, quelqu'un de vraiment malade n'a pas d'autre solution que d' à Athènes dans une clinique privée."
Son épouse, la quarantaine comme lui, est secrétaire dans le privé et gagne 650
barbour outlet
euros net par mois - "sans prime", relève-t-il. Pour leurs 700 euros mensuels - ils ont contracté un prêt sur quinze ans
peuterey
pour l'achat de leur appartement - et pour élever "correctement" leurs deux enfants, Athanase travaille au noir, l'après-midi, une fois fini son service à l'h?pital. Ce qu'il fait ? Le même job de technicien radio,
barbour
mais dans le privé. Avec un salaire "une fois et demi plus élevé". En clair, il
www.achbanker.com/home.php
se débrouille, faisant double journée comme "80 % des fonctionnaires", insiste-t-il. Au su et au vu de tous.
Athanase Telonis
woolrich outlet Les bonus provisionnés par BNP Pa
n'est pourtant pas un terroriste. Ni un de ces jeunes desperados qui font régulièrement le coup de poing à la fin des manifestations, lan?ant des pavés contre les banques et guignant la . Ni même
hollister
un militant syndicaliste. C'est un Grec ordinaire, l'un des quelque huit cent mille fonctionnaires (sur onze millions d'habitants) que compte le pays.
Ce n'est pas le cas, à
hollister sale
l', dans les h?pitaux publics. Les milliards d'euros de dettes accumulés par ces derniers, "sur le dos des contribuables", sont le fait, assure-t-il, d'une administration corrompue : les laboratoires pharmaceutiques et autres fournisseurs d'équipement médicaux "n'hésitent pas à la patte des médecins ou des directeurs d'h?pitaux", fulmine-t-il.
hésite. "Cela va me co?ter ma journée de salaire", rechigne-t-il. Technicien en radiologie médicale à l'h?pital ènes, ce père de gagne 950 euros net par mois. S'y ajoutent entre 100 à 150 euros mensuels, correspondant aux primes et à l'allocation pour les enfants. Ou, plut?t, s'y ajoutaient. Depuis fin mars, austérité oblige, son revenu mensuel a été amputé de 100 euros d'un coup. Le treizième mois aussi a été raboté : 30 % à la trappe !
Reste le quatorzième mois, équivalent
louboutin pas cher
à un mois de salaire de base, versé chaque année en décembre. Un
hollister
quatorzième mois ? "C'est un truc inventé pour ne pas les petits salaires", sourit le fonctionnaire. Tous les employés du secteur public y ont droit. Ou
abercrombie Les associations
plut?t y avaient droit.
Le secteur public de la santé, unanimement décrit comme moribond, a-t-il un en ? "Oui, pour les pauvres, répond le docteur Goudas. Et pour les patients qui nécessitent des soins lourds ou très spécialisés." Quant au projet d'assainissement de l' et du Fonds monétaire , "aucun Grec
barbour sale
n'y croit sérieusement", estime Mme Tsaganas. "Pour que ?a marche, ajoute-t-elle, il faudrait une sorte de . Sauf qu'ici, il
abercrombie
n'y a pas de Roosevelt."
A l'idée de cette suppression, le paisible Athanase s'enflamme. "Je veux bien me la ceinture. Mais qu'on commence par en prison nos trois cents députés et leurs copains ministres ! Ceux d'aujourd'hui et ceux d'hier. Ceux qui ont fait de l'évasion fiscale un national. Ceux qui ont détourné l'argent de l'Etat et de l', s'exclame-t-il. S'il le faut, je descendrai dans la rue. Avec un couteau..."
"Si on ne paye pas, l'infirmière de garde ne passe pas. Et le médecin ne examine ni avant, ni après l'accouchement", confirme Caroline Tsaganas, mère de famille fran?aise, présidente de l'Association des francophones de l'Acha?e (Péloponnèse). Les "enveloppes" peuvent , selon
giuseppe zanotti sneakers
le service demandé, de 500 euros jusqu'à 2 000, voire 3
ugg pas cher
000 euros. Et il en faut souvent plusieurs !
Lui-même, de par sa spécialité, ne peut guère bénéficier de ce qu'on appelle les "petites enveloppes". Mais il conna?t. Quel Grec ne conna?t pas ? Dans les h?pitaux comme ailleurs, elles sont si courantes qu'elles passent pour normales. Les médecins cliniciens, les infirmières, les sages-femmes, les anesthésistes... chacun touche sa "petite enveloppe". Pas si petite, d'ailleurs, à écouter les témoignages, répétitifs et concordants, recueillis à Athènes et Patras. C'est ainsi que Pauline, jeune Fran?aise résidant depuis peu dans le Péloponnèse, a abandonné l'idée d' à l'h?pital public : sans un dessous-de-table de 2 000 euros, lui a-t-on indiqué, le médecin
barbour paris
gynécologue, pas plus que l'infirmière ne se donneraient la peine de sa avec la diligence requise.
Autrefois médecin dans le public, le docteur Léonidas Goudas travaille aujourd'hui à la maternité privée de Patras. "Depuis dix ans, explique-t-il, le privé a littéralement explosé", poussant et prospérant sur les ruines du secteur public. Les infirmières de la clinique, payées autour de 800 euros par mois, "le même salaire qu'à l'h?pital", précise le médecin, ont une "tout autre mentalité". Le docteur Goudas s'en réjouit : "Ici, le personnel ne fait pas grève. Chacun sait qu'il peut être sanctionné ou viré, si le travail est mal fait."
wlkleo00cpz
Posted: Mon 7:32, 16 Sep 2013
Post subject: woolrich bologna Why Motorists Distrust Council Pa
Barrie Segal is an after dinner speaker, author and broadcaster. His after dinner talks about the crazy world of parking tickets,and how to fight unfair parking tickets are both hilarious and informative. Richard Hammond of "Top Gear" fame called him "The UK's leading parking ticket expert". To learn more go to after dinner speaking
It all started in 1994when parking enforcement in the UK became decriminalised as a result of the Road Traffic Act 1991 which removed parking enforcement responsibilities from the police and shifted them to local authorities if an authority elected to take over enforcement.
The first decriminalised parking tickets were issued in 1994 and were called penalty charge notices (often referred to as a "PCN").
Since that date as more and more local authorities have taken over parking enforcement there has been an increasing distrust of the system by motorists.
This article looks at the reason for this.
When the police dealt with parking enforcement they took a pragmatic view. They had two main concerns, [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/woolrich.php]woolrich bologna[/url] the first was to ensure that traffic was kept moving and the second was to ensure the safety of all road users, motorists and pedestrians alike.
[url=http://www.achbanker.com/home.php]www.achbanker.com/home.php[/url] They operated in a very simple way - if they saw a motorist parking a car where parking was not permitted they [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/woolrich.php]woolrich parka[/url] would simply tell the motorist that he or she had to move and if they didn't and the police came back in say 5 minutes and the vehicle was still there they would issue a parking fine.
Sometimes if they didn't see the motorist but knew where the motorist's office was they would go to the office and say please move your car or else. What this did was keep traffic moving in a very efficient way.
There was no financial incentive for the police to issue parking tickets because they did not receive the revenues that parking enforcement generated.
However under decriminalised parking this all changed. Under these new laws local authorities were allowed to keep the revenues generated by parking enforcement. So immediately there was a conflict between the need to move traffic along and the safety of [url=http://www.davidhabchy.com]barbour outlet[/url] road users on the one hand and revenue raising on the other. The authorities will say very simply there was never a conflict because it was not about raising revenue and will point out that it is in fact illegal to issue parking tickets solely to raise revenue.
However, statistics and facts tend to contradict this. If we look at London which was the first city to undertake decriminalised parking the statistics are revealing.
The first figures for 1995/1996 show a total of 3.4 million tickets issued. In the following year it increased to 3.59 million tickets issued. In the following year the number of tickets issued increased to 3.79 million and the next year to 4.07 million.
Many councils also took over the enforcement of moving traffic violations.
By the year 2004/5 the number of parking tickets increased so that in that year more than 5 million parking tickets were issued together with 835,000 bus lane tickets and more than 100,000 moving traffic tickets. The following year parking tickets remained constant but bus lane and moving traffic ticket together reached nearly 1.1 million!
Currently the total number of parking tickets, bus lane and moving traffic tickets issued in London has dropped but the total is almost 5 million.
In 2008 new parking laws came into force in England [url=http://www.achbanker.com/home.php]hollister[/url] and Wales and since then [url=http://www.maximoupgrade.com/hot.php]hollister france[/url] parking attendants have been called civil enforcement officers - but for the purpose of this article I will refer to them as parking attendants.
In my view a major factor giving rise to the distrust of motorists is the fact [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/louboutin.php]louboutin[/url] that many local authorities have contracted out their parking enforcement to outside contractors. Whilst councils would deny that they have less control over these contractors and their parking attendants the facts once again contradict this. To make the position worse councils have often subcontracted the consideration of appeals by motorists to the very contractors who have issued the [url=http://www.vivid-host.com/barbour.htm]barbour uk outlet[/url] parking tickets!
Common sense will tell anybody that unless the councils are able to talk to each and every parking attendant every day they cannot exercise proper control over them . Moreover [url=http://www.vivid-host.com/barbour.htm]www.vivid-host.com/barbour.htm[/url] how can they exercise normal quality control in the way that parking attendants work?
By the same token contractors will claim that they have no targets and no financial interest in issuing lots of parking tickets, rather it's better for them financially if they only issue parking tickets correctly. [url=http://www.lcdmo.com/jordanpascher.php]jordan pas cher[/url] But if that's the case why have there been so many cases of parking attendants fraudulently issuing parking tickets? I have many cases where fraudulent parking tickets have been issued but this article is not the place to go into the detail.
So how can local authorities change the motorists' perception of parking enforcement?
Let's first examine the main complaints that motorists have.
1. Parking tickets are often issued unfairly when the parking attendant knows for example that [url=http://www.davidhabchy.com]barbour sale[/url] the motorist is loading or unloading and is therefore entitled to park.
2. The whole parking enforcement system is not transparent.
3. Councils are only interested in money and therefore do not properly take into account information sent to them when appeals lodged against a ticket.
4. Parking attendants indulge in unfair or sometimes fraudulent practices in order to issue parking tickets. If as councils and contractors claim there are no targets why would any parking attendant commit fraud to issue a parking ticket?
Here is my solution:
At a minimum councils should
Take back in house all currently subcontracted parking enforcement. There should be no exceptions.
2. Councils must ensure the proper training of parking attendants and also ensure that they are properly paid.
3. Councils should make clear that parking attendants a) will [url=http://www.maximoupgrade.com/hot.php]hollister[/url] face disciplinary proceedings if they indulge in unfair practices and b) will be reported to the police if they indulge in fraudulent practices.
4. Parking attendant should be required to watch for a longer period of time (say 10 minutes rather than the normal 5 minutes) where goods vehicles are involved to ensure that they are loading or unloading before issuing a parking ticket.
These are not great steps - in fact they are very simple and straightforward steps. But will the councils take them? Only time will tell.
相关的主题文章:
[url=http://www.mcorchids.co.za/sales/item/4881]barbour Professionisti del trasloco in rete, su tr[/url]
[url=http://www.protekenergy.com.cn/read-htm-tid-520089.html]woolrich parka Abiti per la mamma della sposa sposo ALTAMODAMILANO.IT corso vene[/url]
[url=http://ilms-saga.jp/cgi-def/admin/C-002/notice-board/visit/main.pl?PAGE_NUM=1%2525255Dfarmville]air jordan Clash Graphics[/url]
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
gBlue v1.3 // Theme created by
Sopel
&
Programosy
Regulamin