wlkleo00cpz
Hall of Fame
Joined: 19 Jul 2013
Posts: 10259
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon 16:09, 14 Oct 2013 Post subject: abercrombie milano 10 Commonly Confused Words |
|
|
Jonathan Moore
Submitted 2012-12-14 19:18:15 Many people who learn English as their second language can get several words wrong. The surprising thing is that even native [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/abercrombie/]abercrombie milano[/url] English speakers can commit such errors. There are many top 10 lists on common misspelled or confused words in English. Here is one.
1. Affect and [url=http://www.fsocea.com/E_GuestBook.asp]louboutin[/url] Effect
Although seasoned writers will hardly confuse these words, those learning the language actually do. To avoid confusion, think of "affect" as a verb and "effect" as a noun, although the latter can also be used as a verb. The confusion stems from the fact that these two words have related meanings. The word "affect" means to influence, while "effect" means the result or outcome.
2. Alright and All Right
Now, this is not necessarily troublesome. The word "all right" has always been considered as the right form of the word, while "alright" is considered by some purists as the illiterate form. However, more and more writers are seen to use the word "alright." Keep in mind that "all right" is the standard form. By this time, though, it seems impossible to say that "alright" is wrong.
3. Lose and Loose
Many people write "lose" but mean "loose", or write "loose" but actually mean "lose." The word "lose" is a verb, while "loose" is an adjective. These sentences are wrong:
"I want [url=http://www.mnfruit.com/airjordan.php]jordan[/url] to loose weight." [url=http://www.sandvikfw.net/shopuk.php]hollister outlet sale[/url] The word here should be "lose."
"My pants are lose." The word probably is "loose" or "lost," if the writer means their pants are missing.
4. Desert and Dessert
These two words are also confusing for many people, maybe because of their spellings. The noun "desert" is a place, while "dessert" is food. You don't say, "The desert tastes delicious." At the same time, you don't [url=http://www.jjqcmr.cn/E_GuestBook.asp]air jordan[/url] say, "Camels walk on the dessert." Take note that when there is one "s", you are pertaining to a dry, treeless place. "Desert" can also be a verb that means to [url=http://www.jordanpascherofficiele.com]air jordan[/url] abandon.
5. To, Too, and Two
These three words should never be mixed up at all. "To" is either a preposition or a part of an infinitive. For example:
I went to the doctor. (Here, "to" is used as a preposition.)
He chose to give his money to the poor. (For this sentence, "to" is used as part of an infinitive.)
"Too" is an adverb that either means "very" or "also."
"Two" is, of course, a number.
6. Stationary and Stationery
"Stationary" means motionless or fixed. You can use [url=http://www.mnfruit.com/louboutinpascher.php]louboutin pas cher[/url] it to describe standing or still objects. "Stationery" is a noun that pertains to materials used for [url=http://www.jeremyparendt.com/Barbour-Paris.php]barbour pas cher soldes[/url] writing. [url=http://www.365kl.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=]louboutin Jean Leonetti Je ne sais plus ce qu'es[/url] Use "stationery" when you are referring to paper and envelopes.
7. It's and Its
These two words can be easily mistaken. To avoid confusion when [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/abercrombie/]abercrombie[/url] using either one in a sentence, see if it makes sense to substitute "it is." If not, you probably should use "its."
8. Altogether and All together
These two are often mixed up, [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/airjordan.php]jordan pas cher[/url] because both seem to be the same. If you can substitute "completely" or "all in all" to the word, you most likely mean "altogether." If you can use either "all" or "together," then [url=http://www.lcdmo.com/hollister.php]hollister pas cher[/url] you most likely mean "all together."
9. Fewer and Less
Use "fewer" to refer to things you can count (marbles, candies, or chairs) and "less" for the things that you cannot count (flour, water, or sand).
10. Could of and Could [url=http://www.gotprintsigns.com/abercrombiepascher/]abercrombie pas cher[/url] Have
Due to the way people say it, "could have" or "would have" are sometimes misspelled as [url=http://www.teatrodeoro.com/hollisterde.php]hollister[/url] "could of" or "would [url=http://www.jeremyparendt.com/jimmy-choo.php]jimmy choo paris[/url] of."
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|